Photo-illustration by Jennifer Albarracin Moya. Photographs by Getty Images.
In 1994, a Bethesda organization called the World Future Society sent out a press release announcing a report that predicted what life would be like in 2025. One local journalist stuck the release in a desk drawer at the time, and he recently came across it and sent it our way—just in time to take a look at how accurate the group’s crystal ball turned out to be. So we tracked down the full report, “The Highly Probable Future,” written by a now-deceased futurist named Joseph F. Coates as part of a project exploring how science and technology would reshape the world. How did Coates do? A few highlights:
What It Gets Right
Coates does best on technology. He sees that the internet—a “worldwide, broadband network of networks”—will soon explode, and he’s on top of AI: “The learning of machines, systems, and devices will mimic or surpass human intelligence,” he writes, though his example (a toaster that intuits its user’s preferences) is underwhelming. Coates is right that “communication will be available to any place at any time from anywhere,” and he writes that there will be “countless virtual communities based on electronic linkages.” He also glimpses some of the downsides of the digital future. People in advanced nations, he writes, will become “computer literate” but also “computer dependent.”
What It Gets Wrong
Coates predicts that advances in genomics will help people “live to their mid-80s while enjoying a healthier, fuller life”—but in reality, life expectancy in advanced nations has gone down. Genetically modified foods, he figures, will be more like “low-cholesterol, cancer-busting french fries” than pest-resistant corn. He thinks prefabricated homes will become the norm, making housing “more flexible as well as more affordable.” In the United States, he suggests, we’ll have universal healthcare by now. But perhaps the prediction that aged the worst is that the emergence of a “worldwide middle class” will be “a powerful force for political and economic stability and some forms of democracy.”
What It Totally Misses
The report whiffs on the global rise of authoritarianism and the precarious state of democracy. It misses the ways that technological progress will be motivated more by profit than by the desire to engineer an ideal society. Coates doesn’t foresee how the internet will make people lonelier, erode trust in institutions and information, and stoke global unrest. He believes we’ll end up having a global currency as well as powerful international governing bodies (if anything, nations have become even less cooperative). It makes you a little wistful, actually, to imagine the world Coates envisions: one in which tech companies help us more than exploit us, where people live longer, get along better, and—due to widespread automation—have much more time to relax. Maybe in another 30 years?
This article appears in the February 2025 issue of Washingtonian.
In 1994, the World Future Society Predicted Life in 2025. How’d They Do?
We dug up the old report and took a look.
In 1994, a Bethesda organization called the World Future Society sent out a press release announcing a report that predicted what life would be like in 2025. One local journalist stuck the release in a desk drawer at the time, and he recently came across it and sent it our way—just in time to take a look at how accurate the group’s crystal ball turned out to be. So we tracked down the full report, “The Highly Probable Future,” written by a now-deceased futurist named Joseph F. Coates as part of a project exploring how science and technology would reshape the world. How did Coates do? A few highlights:
What It Gets Right
Coates does best on technology. He sees that the internet—a “worldwide, broadband network of networks”—will soon explode, and he’s on top of AI: “The learning of machines, systems, and devices will mimic or surpass human intelligence,” he writes, though his example (a toaster that intuits its user’s preferences) is underwhelming. Coates is right that “communication will be available to any place at any time from anywhere,” and he writes that there will be “countless virtual communities based on electronic linkages.” He also glimpses some of the downsides of the digital future. People in advanced nations, he writes, will become “computer literate” but also “computer dependent.”
What It Gets Wrong
Coates predicts that advances in genomics will help people “live to their mid-80s while enjoying a healthier, fuller life”—but in reality, life expectancy in advanced nations has gone down. Genetically modified foods, he figures, will be more like “low-cholesterol, cancer-busting french fries” than pest-resistant corn. He thinks prefabricated homes will become the norm, making housing “more flexible as well as more affordable.” In the United States, he suggests, we’ll have universal healthcare by now. But perhaps the prediction that aged the worst is that the emergence of a “worldwide middle class” will be “a powerful force for political and economic stability and some forms of democracy.”
What It Totally Misses
The report whiffs on the global rise of authoritarianism and the precarious state of democracy. It misses the ways that technological progress will be motivated more by profit than by the desire to engineer an ideal society. Coates doesn’t foresee how the internet will make people lonelier, erode trust in institutions and information, and stoke global unrest. He believes we’ll end up having a global currency as well as powerful international governing bodies (if anything, nations have become even less cooperative). It makes you a little wistful, actually, to imagine the world Coates envisions: one in which tech companies help us more than exploit us, where people live longer, get along better, and—due to widespread automation—have much more time to relax. Maybe in another 30 years?
This article appears in the February 2025 issue of Washingtonian.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
Kristi Noem Bag-Theft Mystery Endures, “Senate Twink” Plans Pigeon Sanctuary, and We’ve Got Tips for Doing Yoga in Museums
Does Eleanor Holmes Norton Still Have What It Takes to Fight for DC?
Meet the Winners of the 2025 Washington Women in Journalism Awards
Jim Acosta Talks About Life After CNN
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
An Unusual DC Novel Turns Out to Have an Interesting Explanation
A Timeline of Dan Snyder’s Unsold Mansion
Jim Acosta Talks About Life After CNN
Alexandria Construction Uncovers Part of a Historic Canal
More from News & Politics
Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman Sued Again Over “Predator DC” Series
Elon Musk Got in a Shouting Match at the White House, a Teen Was Stabbed in Fairfax, and Pete Hegseth Decided the Pentagon Needed a Makeup Studio
Steven Spielberg’s Portrait Is Coming to the Smithsonian’s Permanent Collection
Oh No, Elon Musk Will Cut Back His Time in DC; Pentagon Chaos Continues; and Purcellville’s Vice-Mayor Is Under Investigation
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
Kristi Noem Bag-Theft Mystery Endures, “Senate Twink” Plans Pigeon Sanctuary, and We’ve Got Tips for Doing Yoga in Museums
A Near-Comprehensive List of All the Times Ed Martin Acted Like Trump in His “Washington Informer” Interview
A Doctor’s Advice on Protecting Yourself From Measles