To interview the principal deputy director of national intelligence, you must first drive to a bland but very secure office building in Northern Virginia, pass through a gate manned by rifle-toting cops, and stash your phone and voice recorder in a locker, as electronic devices are very much forbidden. A staffer will record your conversation for you. The interview will take place in what’s likely the safest conference room you’ve ever visited.
This rigmarole is worth it because Stacey Dixon is the kind of high-security-clearance Washingtonian you don’t often get to chat with—the number-two at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which compiles the work of the entire US intelligence community for the President. She’s also a native Washingtonian who attended Georgetown Day School before studying engineering at Stanford and Georgia Tech. Dixon likes to go to farmers markets and see shows at the Kennedy Center and listen to gospel, jazz, and go-go. Her life resembles that of a lot of people around here, except that she spends her days fretting over the kind of scary stuff that regular locals never even find out about. “We try to bring it all together and paint a single picture for decision-makers about what the intelligence-community perspective is on whatever question they may ask,” she said when we sat down in the secure room.
How does an engineering major wind up in the spy biz? For Dixon, the dot-com crash of the early 2000s narrowed her post-college options, and “I ended up coming back to DC and realizing how many of our family friends actually worked in the intelligence community.” The CIA brought her onboard to focus on satellite technology, then got hired by the House Intelligence Committee to advise on tech issues.
Dixon also did stints at three-letter agencies (NRO, NGA) and became deputy director and then director of IARPA, which funds research that could benefit intelligence. (One example she offers: the SMART ePANTS project, which seeks to develop clothing that can record audio and video and would have been quite useful in this conference room.)
Now that Dixon has reached the top intelligence echelons, she’s thinking about how to recruit talented people who might never have considered a career in her secretive world. That can be a challenge: How do you attract candidates to a job that many employees can’t even admit they do? “It makes it hard for advertising,” Dixon says. But that could be changing—which, perhaps, is why this interview is happening in the first place. In other words, if you’re looking for a job and have read this far, perhaps America’s spy agencies would be interested in hearing from you.
At the end of our conversation, Dixon headed back to whichever looming threat was currently worrying her, and staffers arrived to present a decidedly old-fashioned piece of technology: a CD-R with a recording of our interview burned onto it. The disc was prominently stamped unclassified. I’ll probably shred it just to be safe.
Andrew Beaujon joined Washingtonian in late 2014. He was previously with the Poynter Institute, TBD.com, and Washington City Paper. He lives in Del Ray.
A Highly Secure Interview With a Very Important Intelligence Insider
Stacey Dixon gives us a peek inside her world.
To interview the principal deputy director of national intelligence, you must first drive to a bland but very secure office building in Northern Virginia, pass through a gate manned by rifle-toting cops, and stash your phone and voice recorder in a locker, as electronic devices are very much forbidden. A staffer will record your conversation for you. The interview will take place in what’s likely the safest conference room you’ve ever visited.
This rigmarole is worth it because Stacey Dixon is the kind of high-security-clearance Washingtonian you don’t often get to chat with—the number-two at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which compiles the work of the entire US intelligence community for the President. She’s also a native Washingtonian who attended Georgetown Day School before studying engineering at Stanford and Georgia Tech. Dixon likes to go to farmers markets and see shows at the Kennedy Center and listen to gospel, jazz, and go-go. Her life resembles that of a lot of people around here, except that she spends her days fretting over the kind of scary stuff that regular locals never even find out about. “We try to bring it all together and paint a single picture for decision-makers about what the intelligence-community perspective is on whatever question they may ask,” she said when we sat down in the secure room.
How does an engineering major wind up in the spy biz? For Dixon, the dot-com crash of the early 2000s narrowed her post-college options, and “I ended up coming back to DC and realizing how many of our family friends actually worked in the intelligence community.” The CIA brought her onboard to focus on satellite technology, then got hired by the House Intelligence Committee to advise on tech issues.
Dixon also did stints at three-letter agencies (NRO, NGA) and became deputy director and then director of IARPA, which funds research that could benefit intelligence. (One example she offers: the SMART ePANTS project, which seeks to develop clothing that can record audio and video and would have been quite useful in this conference room.)
Now that Dixon has reached the top intelligence echelons, she’s thinking about how to recruit talented people who might never have considered a career in her secretive world. That can be a challenge: How do you attract candidates to a job that many employees can’t even admit they do? “It makes it hard for advertising,” Dixon says. But that could be changing—which, perhaps, is why this interview is happening in the first place. In other words, if you’re looking for a job and have read this far, perhaps America’s spy agencies would be interested in hearing from you.
At the end of our conversation, Dixon headed back to whichever looming threat was currently worrying her, and staffers arrived to present a decidedly old-fashioned piece of technology: a CD-R with a recording of our interview burned onto it. The disc was prominently stamped unclassified. I’ll probably shred it just to be safe.
This article appears in the October 2022 issue of Washingtonian.
Andrew Beaujon joined Washingtonian in late 2014. He was previously with the Poynter Institute, TBD.com, and Washington City Paper. He lives in Del Ray.
Most Popular in News & Politics
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope
Kristi Noem Bag-Theft Mystery Endures, “Senate Twink” Plans Pigeon Sanctuary, and We’ve Got Tips for Doing Yoga in Museums
Does Eleanor Holmes Norton Still Have What It Takes to Fight for DC?
Meet the Winners of the 2025 Washington Women in Journalism Awards
Jim Acosta Talks About Life After CNN
Washingtonian Magazine
May Issue: 52 Perfect Saturdays
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
An Unusual DC Novel Turns Out to Have an Interesting Explanation
A Timeline of Dan Snyder’s Unsold Mansion
Jim Acosta Talks About Life After CNN
Alexandria Construction Uncovers Part of a Historic Canal
More from News & Politics
This Year’s Smithsonian Folklife Festival Is All About Youth Culture
Trump Messed Up DC’s Credit Rating, Pete Hegseth Got a “Dirty” Line Installed at the Pentagon, and Jeff Bezos Doesn’t Need Us Anymore
Restaurateurs, Politicos, Journalists: Photos of the Best Parties Around DC
Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman Sued Again Over “Predator DC” Series
Elon Musk Got in a Shouting Match at the White House, a Teen Was Stabbed in Fairfax, and Pete Hegseth Decided the Pentagon Needed a Makeup Studio
Steven Spielberg’s Portrait Is Coming to the Smithsonian’s Permanent Collection
Oh No, Elon Musk Will Cut Back His Time in DC; Pentagon Chaos Continues; and Purcellville’s Vice-Mayor Is Under Investigation
Please Stop Joking That JD Vance Killed the Pope