In his new book, Clash, Northwestern University professor Jon Marshall examines the adversarial relationship between Presidents and journalists amid periods of national crisis. We asked him to pick five moments when that conflict proved especially consequential.
1798:
John Adams uses the newly enacted Alien and Sedition Acts to muzzle his press critics. Despite more than 100 prosecutions at the federal and state levels, the move ultimately backfires. “It was causing lots of excitement and controversy,” Marshall says, “which in the end drove up news-paper sales.”
1862:
After Abraham Lincoln suggests that free Black Americans move to Central America, an outraged abolitionist press amplifies its calls to outlaw slavery. “With pressure from the abolitionist press and concern about the war,” Marshall says, “Lincoln secretly drafted the Emancipation Proclamation that summer.”
1917:
The Woodrow Wilson administration uses new legislation outlawing expressions of disloyalty to prosecute journalists. Among those arrested are employees of a magazine that had published cartoons critical of the war effort. “It was definitely a period of great repression against the free press,” Marshall says.
1933:
With some of the country’s leading papers railing against government expansion associated with the New Deal, FDR turns to a novel piece of technology—the radio. “He starts holding his fireside chats,” Marshall says, “as a way to get around the gatekeepers—these powerful publishers whom he was in conflict with.”
1969:
Richard Nixon’s administration devises a new way to delegitimize journalists, branding them as “elites” and describing them as “the media,” which, according to Marshall, makes the press seem like something “you should be concerned about in the same way you are about crime or drugs.”
This article appears in the May 2022 issue of Washingtonian.
Luke Mullins is a senior writer at Washingtonian magazine focusing on the people and institutions that control the city’s levers of power. He has written about the Koch Brothers’ attempt to take over The Cato Institute, David Gregory’s ouster as moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, the collapse of Washington’s Metro system, and the conflict that split apart the founders of Politico.
5 Key Clashes Between Presidents and the Press
A new book chronicles a fraught relationship.
In his new book, Clash, Northwestern University professor Jon Marshall examines the adversarial relationship between Presidents and journalists amid periods of national crisis. We asked him to pick five moments when that conflict proved especially consequential.
1798:
John Adams uses the newly enacted Alien and Sedition Acts to muzzle his press critics. Despite more than 100 prosecutions at the federal and state levels, the move ultimately backfires. “It was causing lots of excitement and controversy,” Marshall says, “which in the end drove up news-paper sales.”
1862:
After Abraham Lincoln suggests that free Black Americans move to Central America, an outraged abolitionist press amplifies its calls to outlaw slavery. “With pressure from the abolitionist press and concern about the war,” Marshall says, “Lincoln secretly drafted the Emancipation Proclamation that summer.”
1917:
The Woodrow Wilson administration uses new legislation outlawing expressions of disloyalty to prosecute journalists. Among those arrested are employees of a magazine that had published cartoons critical of the war effort. “It was definitely a period of great repression against the free press,” Marshall says.
1933:
With some of the country’s leading papers railing against government expansion associated with the New Deal, FDR turns to a novel piece of technology—the radio. “He starts holding his fireside chats,” Marshall says, “as a way to get around the gatekeepers—these powerful publishers whom he was in conflict with.”
1969:
Richard Nixon’s administration devises a new way to delegitimize journalists, branding them as “elites” and describing them as “the media,” which, according to Marshall, makes the press seem like something “you should be concerned about in the same way you are about crime or drugs.”
This article appears in the May 2022 issue of Washingtonian.
Luke Mullins is a senior writer at Washingtonian magazine focusing on the people and institutions that control the city’s levers of power. He has written about the Koch Brothers’ attempt to take over The Cato Institute, David Gregory’s ouster as moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, the collapse of Washington’s Metro system, and the conflict that split apart the founders of Politico.
Most Popular in News & Politics
The US Tried Permanent Daylight Saving Time in the ’70s. People Hated It
Meet the 2024 Washingtonians of the Year
Wonderland Books Is Now Open in Bethesda
A Historic DC Theater Is for Sale. But Can Any Theater Company Afford It?
Who Is Rayful Edmond III? An Explainer
Washingtonian Magazine
January Issue: He's Back
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Local Scientists Are Building a Fake Star
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This December
What Does the DC “Love Is Blind” Tell Us About Life in the District?
The Lost History of a DC Black Neighborhood That Was Never Built
More from News & Politics
What Yet Another Government Shutdown Could Mean for DC
The Year 2024 in Returns to Washington
Why This Former NIH Head Throws Bipartisan Singing Parties
Meet the 2024 Washingtonians of the Year
Lilith Fest Will Bring the Spirit of the ’90s Back to DC This Weekend
A Good Luck Baby, the World’s Biggest Pupusa, and DC’s Favorite Tree: Our Most Heartwarming Stories of 2024
A Historic DC Theater Is for Sale. But Can Any Theater Company Afford It?
The Condo From Hell, NIH Disease Detectives, and the Most Popular Dog in Politics: Washingtonian’s Favorite Longreads of 2024