In his new book, Clash, Northwestern University professor Jon Marshall examines the adversarial relationship between Presidents and journalists amid periods of national crisis. We asked him to pick five moments when that conflict proved especially consequential.
1798:
John Adams uses the newly enacted Alien and Sedition Acts to muzzle his press critics. Despite more than 100 prosecutions at the federal and state levels, the move ultimately backfires. “It was causing lots of excitement and controversy,” Marshall says, “which in the end drove up news-paper sales.”
1862:
After Abraham Lincoln suggests that free Black Americans move to Central America, an outraged abolitionist press amplifies its calls to outlaw slavery. “With pressure from the abolitionist press and concern about the war,” Marshall says, “Lincoln secretly drafted the Emancipation Proclamation that summer.”
1917:
The Woodrow Wilson administration uses new legislation outlawing expressions of disloyalty to prosecute journalists. Among those arrested are employees of a magazine that had published cartoons critical of the war effort. “It was definitely a period of great repression against the free press,” Marshall says.
1933:
With some of the country’s leading papers railing against government expansion associated with the New Deal, FDR turns to a novel piece of technology—the radio. “He starts holding his fireside chats,” Marshall says, “as a way to get around the gatekeepers—these powerful publishers whom he was in conflict with.”
1969:
Richard Nixon’s administration devises a new way to delegitimize journalists, branding them as “elites” and describing them as “the media,” which, according to Marshall, makes the press seem like something “you should be concerned about in the same way you are about crime or drugs.”
This article appears in the May 2022 issue of Washingtonian.
Luke Mullins is a senior writer at Washingtonian magazine focusing on the people and institutions that control the city’s levers of power. He has written about the Koch Brothers’ attempt to take over The Cato Institute, David Gregory’s ouster as moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, the collapse of Washington’s Metro system, and the conflict that split apart the founders of Politico.
5 Key Clashes Between Presidents and the Press
A new book chronicles a fraught relationship.
In his new book, Clash, Northwestern University professor Jon Marshall examines the adversarial relationship between Presidents and journalists amid periods of national crisis. We asked him to pick five moments when that conflict proved especially consequential.
1798:
John Adams uses the newly enacted Alien and Sedition Acts to muzzle his press critics. Despite more than 100 prosecutions at the federal and state levels, the move ultimately backfires. “It was causing lots of excitement and controversy,” Marshall says, “which in the end drove up news-paper sales.”
1862:
After Abraham Lincoln suggests that free Black Americans move to Central America, an outraged abolitionist press amplifies its calls to outlaw slavery. “With pressure from the abolitionist press and concern about the war,” Marshall says, “Lincoln secretly drafted the Emancipation Proclamation that summer.”
1917:
The Woodrow Wilson administration uses new legislation outlawing expressions of disloyalty to prosecute journalists. Among those arrested are employees of a magazine that had published cartoons critical of the war effort. “It was definitely a period of great repression against the free press,” Marshall says.
1933:
With some of the country’s leading papers railing against government expansion associated with the New Deal, FDR turns to a novel piece of technology—the radio. “He starts holding his fireside chats,” Marshall says, “as a way to get around the gatekeepers—these powerful publishers whom he was in conflict with.”
1969:
Richard Nixon’s administration devises a new way to delegitimize journalists, branding them as “elites” and describing them as “the media,” which, according to Marshall, makes the press seem like something “you should be concerned about in the same way you are about crime or drugs.”
This article appears in the May 2022 issue of Washingtonian.
Luke Mullins is a senior writer at Washingtonian magazine focusing on the people and institutions that control the city’s levers of power. He has written about the Koch Brothers’ attempt to take over The Cato Institute, David Gregory’s ouster as moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, the collapse of Washington’s Metro system, and the conflict that split apart the founders of Politico.
Most Popular in News & Politics
How Many People Were at Kamala Harris’s DC Rally? A Crowd-Size Researcher Weighs In.
What to Know About the 2024 Women’s March
I Made Dinner Using Kamala Harris and Tim Walz Recipes
Allan Lichtman Is Very Comfortable About Predicting the 2024 Election
Allan Lichtman: “I Am Going to Take Some Time Off to Assess Why I Was Wrong”
Washingtonian Magazine
November Issue: Top Doctors
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Guest List: 5 People We’d Love to Hang Out With This November
A New Book Captures DC’s Media Softball League
This DC Group Is Restoring Public Golf Courses
Fired by Trump, an Inspector General Writes a Book on Why the Job Matters
More from News & Politics
Washington Post Tells Employees: It’s Time to Return to the Office
Trayon White Won Reelection to the DC Council. His Federal Bribery Case is Ongoing. What Happens Next?
Could Trump’s Second Term Spell the End of Home Rule in DC?
A WTOP Reporter, a Maryland Man, and the Fight for Lung Cancer Awareness
We Tried Out InPress, a Dating App for News Junkies
A Somber Day at Howard University as Harris Concedes
Want to Move to Another Country? It Won’t Be Easy. Here Are Some Ideas Anyway.
Did a Bigger Share of DC Voters Pick Trump This Year?